On the afternoon of July 8, 2026, AHRMA’s Board of Trustees met via video conference to review rules proposals for the 2027 racing season. A summary of the proposals, including committee recommendations and trustee preliminary votes may be found below.

Members may comment on the rule proposals / votes using these guidelines:

• If a proposal has already been commented on, please reply to the current thread to keep those comments together
• Use the find function (shortcuts are command-F on a Mac, Control-F or CTRL-F on a PC) and enter the Entry ID # to find associated comments
• You may only make a comment on ONE rule/Entry ID in each of your comments
• Entry ID is REQUIRED
• Your contact information is REQUIRED although it won’t be displayed

Any comments not following these guidelines WILL BE REMOVED.

The Member Comment Period is July 15-21. Final voting is tentatively scheduled to take place on August 12. Each Trustee’s initials are listed by his/her actions below.

The votes recorded below are votes for/against the proposed change; If “yes”, the preliminary vote is in favor of the proposal, if “no”, the preliminary vote is against the proposal. If the vote is anything other than “yes” or “no”, a note regarding the motion and what was voted on is included in “Discussion”.

Underlined wording would be new for the 2027 Handbook, a strike-through indicates wording proposed to be removed.

July 8:

Chairman of the Board, Greg Tomlinson, called to order at 4:06 pm Eastern

Trustees in Attendance: Bob Robbins, Colton Roberts, Ellen Voermans, Greg Tomlinson (Chairman), Jeff Bushey, Jeff Hargis, Jeff Oakley, David Stanton, Luke Sayer, Tim Terrell (Treasurer), Wes Poole (Secretary).

Absent: Tod Miller

Guest(s): Daniel May (Executive Director), Cindy McLean (AHRMA Communications), Steve Massey (Chairman, Editorial Committee / Rule Change Proposal Process)

Ed Roman (Special Committee Chair) joined at 6:28 pm Eastern

Jeff Bushey left at around 7:30 pm Eastern

Preliminary vote process conducted. 7:40 pm Eastern motion to adjourn WP, JH seconded. Meeting adjourned.

General & Housekeeping

Entry ID 14393 3.3.14

All helmets used in road racing and flat track must have been manufactured within the prior 60 months 72 months of the date of competition and meet Snell (or equivalent) standard at the time of manufacture. (Patrick McGraw, Member #6278)

Rule Change Rationale The Snell Memorial Foundation’s recommends replacing helmets after “5 years of normal use...”NOT 5 years from date of manufacture.Everyone knows that new helmets sit in a warehouse for AT LEAST a year before they are sold. In most cases, it’s even longer. Sitting on a shelf does NOT constitute “normal use.” AHRMA would still be in compliance with the Snell recommendation with a 72 month from date of manufacture policy. The Snell recommendation is below, copied directly from the SMF website:

“Unused helmets stored in good condition do not automatically expire after five years. Replacing helmets every five years is a judgement call based on testing helmets used by the California Highway Patrol by Dr. George Snively. Wear and tear, the simple act of putting on and taking off helmets, damage the comfort pads and energy absorbing foam liner over time. Helmets with worn-out pads are at least one to two sizes larger than helmets in new condition. A poorly fitted helmet makes it more likely that the helmet will shift too much or even come off the head during a crash impact. For these reasons, Snell recommends replacing helmet after five years of normal use.“

Committee Recommendation: Reject (Unanimous)
Committee Discussion: Not aligned with industry standards.
Board Discussion: Motion to vote GT, Second EV
July Board: no (1 yes JH / 10 no)

Entry ID 14429 3.3.14

3.3.14 Helmets must be used in all AHRMA competitions and practices. Helmets worn in road racing and flat track must be full-face type and certified by the manufacturer by having a sticker affixed to the helmet stating the helmet meets or exceeds the Snell M2015 2020, Snell M2025, FIM BSI 6658 Type A (“Blue Label”) , FIM ECER22.05, ECE 22.05 (accepted through 2027), ECE 22.06 or FIM JIST 8133: 2000, or FIM FRHPhe-02 standard. All helmets used in road racing and flat track must have been manufactured within the prior 60 months of the date of competition and meet Snell (or equivalent) standard at the time of manufacture. Only OEM chin-strap fasteners may be used (no aftermarket quick-release fasteners are allowed). This change is provisional for the 2022 season only. All helmets must be intact, and no modification may be made to their construction that alters the helmet from the condition it was tested and approved. The helmet is made to provide protection and is not a platform to attach foreign objects. Cameras or other accessories are NOT permitted to be attached to the rider’s helmet.

Helmets worn in vintage, and post vintage motocross, next gen motocross and cross county may be open[1]or must be full-face type and certified by the manufacturer by having a sticker affixed to the helmet stating the helmet meets or exceeds U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) FMVSS 218 and at least one of the following standards:

U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) FMVSS 218; Snell M2010 2020, Snell M2025; Europe’s ECE 22.05 ‘P’ (accepted through 2027), or ECE 22.06 ‘P’, ‘NP’ or ‘J’; or Japan’s JIS T 8133:2007. It is recommended that motocross and cross country helmets be removed from service after five years from date of manufacture; helmets greater than five years old – but no more than 10 years old – may be used at the discretion of the Tech Inspector. Only OEM chin-strap fasteners may be used. Helmets worn in vintage trials may be half, open or full-face type and must meet or exceed U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) motorcycle standards or equivalent international standards.

All helmets are subject to inspection by AHRMA competition officials to ensure compliance. This inspection does not warrant the condition of a participant’s helmet.

It is the responsibility of the participant to ensure his/her their helmet is in compliance with AHRMA requirements. Riders are prohibited from using damaged helmets. If there is any question regarding the condition of a helmet, technical inspection will consult with the Road Race Referee, Road Race Director, or Off-road Race Director on final determination on acceptance for use in competition. Their decision is final and not subject to appeal.

Rule Change Rationale: Submitted on behalf of the AHRMA Safety Committee: The current helmet requirements are outdated and not in line current certifications or with other racing sanctioning bodies. There are references to approvals that were supposed to only apply to 2022 race season. The revised helmet requirements were unanimously approved by the AHRMA Safety Committee. The revision are in line with up to date with the national and international requirements. Overall these changes help reduce risk to the organization. (Bill Gillis, Member #8747)

Committee Recommendation: Accept (Unanimous)
Committee Discussion: Safety committee has done the research with other organizations, including FIM, as generally accepted practices. Additionally, NJ has Snell 2020 requirement for racing helmets. We need to be aligned with other organizations. Shouldn’t be an RCP in the future – should be a safety committee responsibility to update.
Board Discussion: Moving forward, it’s an update which will be required in the handbook if there’s any change that the industry standard as a safety item. It was agreed that it’s more housekeeping rather than a rule change and will be the responsibility of the safety committee to update in the future and not part of the RCP process.
Motion to vote GT, second BR
July Board: yes (10 yes / 1 no DS)

General Road Racing Rules

Entry ID 14403 9.6.5

9.6.5 Points will be awarded at all roadraces according to the following schedule. National championship events also award regional-championship points for the region in which the event takes place.

National Series awards are based on a rider’s best finishes in one-half of the total number of races up to 20, in the series, rounded up to the next whole number if necessary (e.g., in a 19-race series, a rider’s 10 best finishes count). A rider must score points in at least two events to be eligible for National series awards. Criteria for Regional Series Awards will be defined and published prior to the first event of the year. Yearly schedule changes to events and locations may change the regional series criteria. Year-end scoring ties will be broken by the greatest number of first-place finishes, then second-place finishes, third place, etc. within the best finishes. If still tied, the position will be awarded to the rider with the better results in any head-to-head, on-track meetings. In the event of an absolute tie, the oldest rider wins.

Committee Recommendation: Accept (Unanimous)
Committee Discussion: Due to the magnitude of points awarded, it never happens, never seen a decision made by this, basically housekeeping.
Board Discussion: Motion to vote WP, second JB
July Board: yes (11 yes / 0 no)

Vintage Road Racing

Entry ID 14374 10.3.1 A i

Maximum rim width: front, 2.5 inches (WM-4); rear, 3.0 3.5 inches (WM-56), except H-D XR750s, which are permitted to use a WM6 (3.5 inches) when fitted with original Morris Magnesium wheels. No Astralite wheels. (John Turner, Member #62)

Rule Change Rationale:

There are several reasons for this rule proposal to be approved.

1. If you try and buy a new mag rear wheel to build a bike, the smallest you can buy is a 5”. This is copied from the Marvic website. Rear3,50″ x 18″ – 4,00 “x 18″ – 4,50″ x 18″. They do not have an option to buy a 3” rear.
2. The rule for Harley also said “when fitted with original Morris Mag wheels” I don’t know about you, but I would not feel confident on running a 50 year old Magnesium wheel.
3. The HD bikes are allowed to run a 5″ rear now, so this rule change would put all bikes on a level playing field and make it easier to buy wheels.
4. Giving other bikes than the HD an extra 1/2” rear rim width is not going to make a bike demonstrably

Link to website to view. Marvic website

Committee Recommendation: Reject (Unanimous)
Committee Rationale/Discussion: The committee agreed that a half inch wheel width increase would potentially create an additional advantage for the higher power machines in the class. We also believed it could cause the current competing members to feel the need to upgrade their already legal machines, at significant cost, for minimal or possibly negative effects.
Board Discussion: Motion to vote WP, second EV
July Board: no (1 yes BR / 9 no / 1 abstain JH)

Entry ID 14380 10.6.3

10.6.3 Eligible Novice Historic Production Heavyweight Motorcycles include:

…
Norton, all 650/750 (except short stroke), 830cc twin-cylinder, OHV-pushrod
…
(David Henderson, Member #2014212)

Rule Change Rationale:

The “classic” time of Production Racing motorcycles is the 1969 – 1978 years, as the class allows. This was the time of Ray Pickrell, Percy Tait, Peter Williams, Paul Smart, Dave Degans, Godier/Genoud and other famous names. Production races during this time showed that the Norton 830cc twin-cylinder, overhead-valve pushror engined racers had no performance advantage over the Honda 4, non-Desmo Ducatis, Kawasaki 500, or Triumph-BSA triple cylinder motorcycles – or even the 750 Norton racers (as allowed in the class).

Including this engine in the class would offer a racing opportunity for Novice riders with a Norton motorcycle of this engine type, allowing the class to fully represent the Classic Production entries of the period.

Committee Recommendation: Reject (Unanimous)
Committee Rationale/Discussion: Production racer was never offered as an 830cc model. Only 750cc in 1970 and 1971. Novice Historic Production Heavyweight is also limited to 750cc.
Board Discussion: Motion to vote GT, second TT
July Board: no (0 yes / 9 no / 2 abstain JB, WP)

Entry ID 14381 10.6.4 h

(h) FAIRINGS AND BODYWORK: Fairings of any type are not allowed, except OEM type as original factory fit. Gas tank, seat and fenders must be OEM equipment or period replacements. No modern “GSXR-style” bodywork will be allowed. (David Henderson, Member #2014212)

Rule Change Rationale:

Allowing the use of original factory-fit fairings will more closely represent the “Golden Age” of Production Racing in the 1969 – 1978 racing period; the exact time period as allowed for motorcycle in the “Historic Production” class. This rule change will show motorcycles visually as they appeared on tracks at this time and will allow owners of interesting “genuine vintage” motorcycles (such as Norton Production Racer and Velocette Thruxton, etc. ) to race in this class.

Speeds reached by Production Racing motorcycles are modest enough that use of a fairing will not significantly increase the speed or lap times of the motorcycle involved.

Committee Recommendation: Accept (Unanimous)
Committee Rationale/Discussion: The committee feels that OEM equipped fairings are keeping within the intended purpose of the class. The change would also the allow Norton 1970/1971 750cc Production Racer.
Board Discussion: Motion to vote WP, second BR
July Board: yes (8 yes / 1 no GT / 2 abstain WP, JB)

Entry ID 14387 10.6 NOVICE HISTORIC PRODUCTION

Novice Historic Production is open to (1st paragraph unchanged)
…
All engine and transmission components and assemblies must maintain OEM dimensions and limits. Aftermarket parts are allowed only if they are a direct replacement for the originals. Modifications for reliability (e.g., starter removal or ignition replacement) or to resolve non-performance issues (e.g., cam chain tension or oil pressure) are permitted. Classes are Lightweight (four-strokes up to 500cc, 250cc two-strokes and specific 350cc two-strokes listed with an asterisk (*) below) and Heavyweight (four-strokes up to 750cc, except as specifically allowed, and 350-500cc two-strokes); three- or four-cylinder DOHC machines are not allowed. (David Henderson, Member #2014212)

Rule Change Rationale: This request is to allow the allowance of slightly larger twin-cylinder, overhead-valve pushrod engines in the heavyweight class, as requested in detail in my Rule Change Request 14380.

Committee Recommendation: Reject (Unanimous)
Committee Rationale/Discussion: This RCP is a “housekeeping” proposal tied to Entry ID: 14380. The committee believes the original 750cc limit was intentional to keep power levels down to a reasonable level for the novice class.
Board Discussion: Motion to vote WP, second JB
July Board: no (0 yes, 10 no, 1 abstain JB)

Entry ID 14412 10.4.3 CLASSIC SIXTIES

Among the eligible machines are:
…

• BSA B50 as as either a single “works” or replica and like design

…
(John Rickard, Member #2181)

Rule Change Rationale: This rule change’s purpose is to get more vintage bikes on the track.

B50 road race bikes are not being raced. The BSA B50 is legal for 500 Premier but racers haven’t entered them in that class. Perhaps B50s will be raced in Classic 60s.

Committee Recommendation: Accept (Unanimous)
Committee Rationale/Discussion: The committee feels that the BSA B50 would be an appropriate fit for the class when outfitted in period GP and Clubman trim. A suggestion from the committee was to allow the B50 with a minimum dry weight of 270lbs in an attempt to keep efforts aimed at maintaining period appearance and avoid a stripped down lightweight racer.
Board Discussion: This proposal intended to add the BSA B50 to the classic 60s class. While the committee recommended acceptance, they suggested a 270lb minimum weight limit to prevent stripped-down, lightweight configurations. Participants debated the enforceability of this weight limit in the current ruleset, eventually deciding that without specific weight verbiage in the proposal, they would vote on the submission as written.
Motion to vote GT, second JO
July Board: no (1 accept TT, 10 reject)

Entry ID 14437 10.11 Moto LeMans

Moto LeMans: Any bike eligible for Formula 125 (10.3.4), 250 Grand Prix (10.2.4), 200 Grand Prix Plus (10.2.5). Eligible bikes include CB/CL160,CB/CL175 all years. No SL175 frames to be used. All stock engine components must be used or accurate replacements. Any combination of Honda engine parts can be used, 160cc engines can be unfitted to 175 spec including 5 speed upgrade. Twin leading shoe front brake only with max size no larger than cb160 brake. 24mm carb max size. Any ignition may be used. Any exhaust may be used, mufflers required. Must use steel fuel tank. No oxygenated fuel. Entry fee shall be the same as all other vintage road race classes. The start shall be a “LeMans” push start of the type previously used for CB160. (Rob Hall, Member #9219)

Rule Change Rationale: We would like to create a cheaper and closer to spec class for these bikes in hopes to bring back the numbers we had when bikes weren’t so cost prohibitive to build. This is a very fun class that will become more fun when we are all on very equal bikes!
Committee Recommendation: Reject (Unanimous)
Committee Rationale/Discussion: The committee fears this risks pulling eligible and currently competeing members out of the class in hopes that they may be replaced by bikes to be built for the class is a risk. The committee would like to add that they support the idea of a cost effective racing but would like to see more than one make/model represented.
Board Discussion: The group discussed a proposal to return the Moto LeMans class to a stock 160/175 model limit. The committee recommended rejection to avoid losing current participants, but Tim Terrell argued that the change would bring back a budget-friendly, spirit-aligned class and most of the current participants have expressed support in favor of this proposal.
Motion to vote GT, second JH
July Board: yes (5 yes / 3 no LS, EV, CR / 3 abstain WP, JO, JB)

Vintage Superbike

Entry ID 14335 10.8.3 (Vintage SB Table)

LIGHTWEIGHT Pushrod twin BMW 650  (Mark Morrison Member #2010668)

Rule Change Rationale:

I would like AHRMA to consider a rule change proposal removing the BMW 650 from the list of approved Vintage Light Weight Superbikes in rule 10.8.3. I believe they have an unfair advantage and are a better fit for the Vintage Middle Weight class. I offer the following reasons:

1. First the BMW’s are between 60cc to 300cc larger engine displacement than the other approved
2. If you look at the lap times the BMW’s consistently turned at races they are 5 to 20 seconds a lap faster than the other makes (see attached spreadsheet). While some of their advantage can be marked down to rider ability the significant cc size allowance doesn’t
3. Their times have been well within the competitive lap times turned by the Vintage Middle Weight bikes (see attached spreadsheet). In most cases those lap times would have resulted in podiums and possible wins. The margin of lap times would be closer than that in the Vintage Light Weight class.

Committee Recommendation: Reject (Unanimous)
Committee Rationale/Discussion:  There have only been 5 champs on BMW in 25 years, most have won on Honda Ascots or Suzuki GS450. Probably the most balanced class in AHRMA. If you are fast you can win on any legal bike.
a. The BMW pushrod R65 has been eligible for VSBLW since the creation of the class, along with the Moto Guzzi V65. These bikes are popular choices for this class.
b. A properly tuned machine (SR500, Honda 400F, Honda Ascot, Suzuki GS) can outperform the BMW. This has been proven in the past.
c. Raced a BMW R65 in the past and found it to be very balanced against the other machines in the class.
d. Finally, if the BMW R65 *was* deemed to be significantly faster than other models in the class, the handbook states:
10.8.4 All classes listed above are based upon an index of performance. If any model proves to be significantly faster than other models in its class, its performance may be restricted by limiting carburetor size, etc. If any model proves to be significantly slower than others in its class, it may be moved down to the next lower class.
Board Discussion: Motion to vote GT, second BR
July Board:  no (0 yes / 10 no / 1 abstain JB)

Next Gen Superbike

Entry ID 14392 10.9.2 NEXT GEN SUPERBIKE 2

10.9.2 NEXT GEN SUPERBIKE 2

Among the eligible machines are:

• 1998-2003 Aprilia RSV Mille, Mille R, Mille SP and Replicas (Haga and Edwards). Bikes are limited to first generation Mille
• 1987 – 2002 Ducati 851, 888 with 996 engine; Ducati 916, 916SP, 916 Corsa and 916R; Ducati 996, 996S, 996SPS, All Ducati motorcycles must use Desmoquattro engines only, no Testastretta engines, heads, or components. Ducati 748, 748R, 748RS may compete, provided engine capacity has been increased by modifying bore and/or stroke to a maximum of 996cc.
• 1994-1995 Honda RC45, 2000-2006 RC51 SP1, RC51 SP2
• 1999-2004 MV Agusta F4 750 ORO, S, S 1+1, SPR, 750cc models
• 1989-2003 Kawasaki ZX7R, ZX7RR models included are L, M, N and P1-P7
• 1996-1999 Suzuki GSX-R750 models N-X (SRAD), 1998-2003 TL1000R
• 1999 Yamaha R7, 1993-1998 YZF750R, YZF750SP

Approved motorcycles must have been available for sale in North America. (John Turner, Member #62)

Rule Change Rationale: This is more of a simple house keeping modification. I just added years to the rulebook model listings to make it simpler for people to understand. No new years or models were added.

Committee Recommendation: Accept (Unanimous)
Committee Rationale/Discussion: This was housekeeping adding years of motorcycles to the rulebook.
Board Discussion: Motion to vote JH, second TT
July Board:  yes (9 yes / 0 no / 2 abstain WP, JB)

Entry ID 14394 10.9.2 NEXT GEN SUPERBIKE 2

Among the eligible machines are:
…

• ​Yamaha R6 1999-2005
• ​Yamaha YZF 600 1994-2005
• ​Kawasaki ZX6 1995-2004, no 636
• ​Suzuki GSX-R 600 1997-2004
• ​Honda CBR 600 F4 and F4i 1999-2006

…

(Michael Platt, Member #1012553)

Rule Change Rationale: Trying to find a place to put newer common 600cc bikes without creating a whole new race class in AHRMA. These bikes will be at a slight disadvantage in this class but it will give them a place to race and help increase grid size and membership in AHRMA
Committee Recommendation: Accept (Unanimous)
Committee Rationale/Discussion: This is to add older 600’s cc bikes to the current 750cc class. It will not upset the class and should add some more machines and entries.
Board Discussion: Motion to vote GT, second TT
July Board:  yes (10 yes / 0 no / 0 abstain)

Sidecar

No RCPs submitted

Modern Road Racing

Entry ID 14367 10.12 b

Triples up to 765800cc (David Pierce, Member #722)

Rule Change Rationale: Allow MV Agusta F3 to compete in SOT2.
Committee Recommendation: Accept (Unanimous)
Committee Rationale/Discussion: current excludes MV & others
Board Discussion: Motion to vote WP, second TT
July Board: yes (10 yes / 0 no / 1 abstain JB)

Entry ID 14370 9.8.1 k (3)

3. OEM airbox systems may be modified or removed. Gen 1 SV650s (1999-2002) may use flat slide carburetors. Air filters may be replaced. Airbox drains must be sealed. Crankcase vent hose must remain routed to the airbox. Crankcase breathers may be modified or replaced. If the airbox is removed, the crankcase vent must be routed to a 120 ounce, leakproof catch can. (Kevin Dinsmoor, Member #1013424)

Rule Change Rationale: A rule that allows removal of air box but not specifically a modification is ambiguous. I see many(nearly all) Supersport bikes with modified air boxes. If they can be removed entirely, the mind set is they can be modified. This would clear that up. Further, if the R7 is allowed in SOT3, it needs to have the air boxes modified, they simply wont run proper at road racing speeds

Committee Recommendation: Accept (Unanimous)
Committee Rationale/Discussion: present rule is unclear
Board Discussion: Motion to vote WP, second JH
July Board:  yes (10 yes / 0 no / 1 abstain JB)

Entry ID 14389 10.12.1.b

10.12.1 MACHINE ELIGIBILITY: Eligible machines include one-, two,– and three, and Four cylinder four-stroke motorcycles, plus rotaries and two-strokes, based on an index of performance. All classes may be run together and scored separately as determined by the number of entries and track conditions. See section 9.8 for additional mechanical requirements:

b) SOUND OF THUNDER 2 (SoT2): Any AHRMA Sound of Singles or Motard machine; liquid-cooled twins to 900cc; unlimited air-cooled twins; triples up to765cc; 4 stroke liquid cooled 4 cylinder up to 636cc, and two-strokes to 250cc are allowed. (John Turner, Member #62)

Rule Change Rationale: 

Hello,

I am the chairman of the Next Gen Rules committee. I have received at least 12 inquires this past 1/2 season about a place in AHRMA for modern 600cc motorcycles. Right now, we do not have a place for them to race. Of the 12 recent inquires, 8 were just before the West coast races. I had to tell these people, unfortunately, we do not have a spot for your bike. Most of these 600cc bikes are no longer produced by the manufacturers. The supersport category is absolutely a Historic class, so one could make an argument with most of the manufacturers not making these bikes anymore, they are Historic.

What this rule change will do is bring in new bikes and Members into an already modern class. In researching these bikes and this class, I found that Sound of Thunder 2 almost mirrored the Moto America Supersport class. Many of the bikes that are eligible in our SOT2 class, except the 4 cylinder 600 machines, are eligible in the MA Supersport class. Moto America shoots for around 130hp for their class, which is what many of the bikes in this class currently produce. The Triumph 765 Moto 2 is 130 hp, Ducati V2 120 hp, a Moto Corse 1200 Air Cooled Ducati Twin is in the 120-140 hp range. Theses new 600cc 4 cylinder machines will not dominate the class, they are all in the same hp range too. This addition will most likely bring in more bikes and MEMBERS which is most important for the long term continuation of the club. The MAIN advantage of this is, it does not add another class to our already bloated schedule. It puts these machines into a place where all will be competitive. It will not outclass what is already winning the class.

I will be making 3 rules proposals to possible change the class. 1, add 4 cylinder 600cc motorcycles, increase twin and triple cc’s. if all the=ree are added, the class will be very similar to MA supersport rules.

Committee Recommendation: Accept (3-1)
Committee Rationale/Discussion: Need a place in AHRMA
Board Discussion: Discussion regarding the current size of the class, and unintended consequences of adding potentially another 10-15 bikes at an event like Barber which already requires SOT2 to run by itself. These bikes already have a number of other organizations they can race with.
Motion to vote WP, second JO
July Board: no (2 yes LS, DS / 4 no BR, JH, CR, JB / 5 abstain)

Entry ID 14390 10.12.1.b

B. SOUND OF THUNDER 2 (SoT2): Any AHRMA Sound of Singles or Motard machine; liquid-cooled twins to 900cc  up to 955cc; unlimited air-cooled twins; triples up to 765cc; and two-strokes to 250cc are allowed. (John Turner, Member #62)

Rule Change Rationale:

Hello,

(I will be making 3 rules proposals to possibly change the class. 1, add 4 cylinder 600cc motorcycles, 2, increase twins and triple cc’s. If all three are adopted, the class will be very similar to MA supersport rules, which it is now already.

I’m using the same rationale for each proposal because I was asked to split them up. This one is to increase the twins cc from 900cc to 955cc. This will allow all Ducati V2 machines in this class.)

I am the chairman of the Next Gen Rules committee. I have received at least 12 inquires this past 1/2 season about a place in AHRMA for modern 600cc motorcycles. Right now, we do not have a place for them to race. Of the 12 recent inquires, 8 were just before the West coast races. I had to tell these people, unfortunately, we do not have a spot for your bike. Most of these 600cc bikes are no longer produced by the manufacturers. The supersport category is absolutely a Historic class, so one could make an argument with most of the manufacturers not making these bikes anymore, they are Historic.

What this rule change will do is bring in new bikes and Members into an already modern class. In researching these bikes and this class, I found that Sound of Thunder 2 almost mirrored the Moto America Supersport class. Many of the bikes that are eligible in our SOT2 class, except the 4 cylinder 600 machines, are eligible in the MA Supersport class. Moto America shoots for around 130hp for their class, which is what many of the bikes in this class currently produce. The Triumph 765 Moto 2 is 130 hp, Ducati V2 120 hp, a Moto Corse 1200 Air Cooled Ducati Twin is in the 120-140 hp range. Theses new 600cc 4 cylinder machines will not dominate the class, they are all in the same hp range too. This addition will most likely bring in more bikes and MEMBERS which is most important for the long term continuation of the club. The MAIN advantage of this is, it does not add another class to our already bloated schedule. It puts these machines into a place where all will be competitive. It will not outclass what is already winning the class.

I will be making 3 rules proposals to possible change the class. 1, add 4 cylinder 600cc motorcycles, increase twin and triple cc’s. if all three are adopted, the class will be very similar to MA supersport rules.

Committee Recommendation: Accept (Unanimous)
Committee Rationale/Discussion: Ducati V2
Board Discussion:  Motion to vote WP, second JH
July Board: yes (7 yes / 0 no / 4 abstain EV, WP, JO, JB)  

Entry ID 14391 10.12.1 b

B. SOUND OF THUNDER 2 (SoT2): Any AHRMA Sound of Singles or Motard machine; liquid-cooled twins to 900cc; unlimited air-cooled twins; liquid cooled triples up to 765cc 890cc; and two-strokes to 250cc are allowed. (John Turner, Member #62)

Rule Change Rationale: 

Hello,

(I will be making 3 rules proposals to possibly change the class. 1, add 4 cylinder 600cc motorcycles, 2, increase twins and triple cc’s. If all three are adopted, the class will be very similar to MA supersport rules, which it is now already.

I’m using the same rationale for each proposal because I was asked to split them up. This will allow up to 890cc triples into the class. The Yamaha R9 would be allowed to compete in this class.)

I am the chairman of the Next Gen Rules committee. I have received at least 12 inquires this past 1/2 season about a place in AHRMA for modern 600cc motorcycles. Right now, we do not have a place for them to race. Of the 12 recent inquires, 8 were just before the West coast races. I had to tell these people, unfortunately, we do not have a spot for your bike. Most of these 600cc bikes are no longer produced by the manufacturers. The supersport category is absolutely a Historic class, so one could make an argument with most of the manufacturers not making these bikes anymore, they are Historic.

What this rule change will do is bring in new bikes and Members into an already modern class. In researching these bikes and this class, I found that Sound of Thunder 2 almost mirrored the Moto America Supersport class. Many of the bikes that are eligible in our SOT2 class, except the 4 cylinder 600 machines, are eligible in the MA Supersport class. Moto America shoots for around 130hp for their class, which is what many of the bikes in this class currently produce. The Triumph 765 Moto 2 is 130 hp, Ducati V2 120 hp, a Moto Corse 1200 Air Cooled Ducati Twin is in the 120-140 hp range. Theses new 600cc 4 cylinder machines will not dominate the class, they are all in the same hp range too. This addition will most likely bring in more bikes and MEMBERS which is most important for the long term continuation of the club. The MAIN advantage of this is, it does not add another class to our already bloated schedule. It puts these machines into a place where all will be competitive. It will not outclass what is already winning the class.

Committee Recommendation: Accept (Unanimous)
Committee Rationale/Discussion: To include Yamaha R9
Board Discussion: Motion to vote BR, second GT
July Board: no (1 yes LS / 6 no / 4 abstain TT, WP, JO, JB)

Entry ID 14397 10.2.1 b

SOUND OF THUNDER 4 (SoT4): Any single or twin cylinder four-stroke production motorcycle up to 400cc 500cc sold in the U.S. with a street-legal VIN. The Ninja 400 All twin cylinder machines over 398cc displacement are is limited to Supersport specifications (see 9.8.1) otherwise it they must compete in SOT3. (Daniel May, Member #11215)

Rule Change Rationale: Multiple manufactures have already introduced new models in the “sub-500” sport bike category, and most others are planning machines in this segment in the near future. The AHRMA SOT4 class is a great way to get young riders interested in racing, and gives AHRMA an opportunity to introduce them to vintage bikes. Unlike our vintage classes, we must evolve our modern classes to remain current with the market.

Committee Recommendation: Accept (Unanimous)
Committee Rationale/Discussion: Accommodate new bikes
Board Discussion:  Motion to vote WP, second CR
July Board:  yes (6 yes / 2 no TT, JH / 3 abstain CR, JO, JB)

Entry ID 14428 10.12.1 c

SOUND OF THUNDER 3 (SoT3): Harley-Davidson XR1200, pushrod OHV twin cylinder machines to 1000cc, OHC two- or three-valve twins to 805cc, SOHC liquid cooled V-twins up to 750cc (plus overbore), OHC liquid-cooled four-valve twins to 650cc. Pushrod OHV machines over 900cc must run under Supersport specifications (see (9.8.1). Suzuki SV650 except carbureted GEN 1, Buell XB9R Ducati 800SS, 750SSie and Monsters limited to Supersport specifications (see 9.8.1); otherwise, must compete in SoT2. GEN 1 Suzuki SV650 may be equipped with Suzuki suspension from other near-year GSXR. Thruxton Cup Challenge eligible machines may compete (see 10.14). Ducatis up to 750cc originally fitted with carburetors (e.g., 1991 1985-98 750 Supersports , Sports, F1’s, Monsters) must meet the mechanical requirements in 9.8 a) through m) only, with the additional requirement being they must use OEM or aftermarket carburetors. Kawasaki Ninja 650, 650R & Z650RS must meet mechanical requirements in 9.8 a) through m) only, with the additional requirement they must retain OEM bore and H-D XR1200 and Ducatis up to 805cc originally fitted with fuel injection (e.g., 750SSie, 800SS) must run under Supersport specifications (see 9.8.1). Machines originally equipped with 18” wheels may convert to 17” wheels. Yamaha R7 & FZ07 allowed on performance index under Supersport specifications with exception of airbox removal or modifications allowed. (Kevin Dinsmoor, Member #1013424)

Rule Change Rationale: Class needed some clean up of language. Changes include adding 1985-1990 production Ducatis up to 750cc which currently have no class other than SOT2 and are not an advantage in the SOT3 class. Also, addition of Yamaha R7 and FZ07 as they are not competitive in SOT2 at all and their performance index puts them comparable to the SV650 Suzuki. It will result in racers with R7’s having a place to race their bikes competitively.

Committee Recommendation: Accept (Unanimous)
Committee Rationale/Discussion: R7 not competitive in SOT2
Board Discussion: Motion to vote WP, second GT
July Board: yes (9 yes / 0 no / 2 abstain JO, DS)

Entry ID 14430  8.4

8.4 SOUND OF THUNDER a) SOUND OF THUNDER 1 (SoT1): Unlimited displacement four-stroke single-, twin- and three-cylinder machines; rotary engines; Open Two-Strokes. See Section 10.12.1.a. b) SOUND OF THUNDER 2 (SoT2): Any AHRMA Sound of Singles or Motard machine, liquid-cooled twins to 900cc, unlimited air-cooled twins, triples up to 765cc, and two-strokes to 250cc are allowed. See Section

10.12.1.b. c) SOUND OF THUNDER 3 (SoT3): Any AHRMA Sound of Singles, Harley-Davidson XR1200, pushrod OHV twin[1]cylinder machines to 1000cc, OHC two- or three-valve twins to 805cc, SOHC liquid[1]cooled V-twins to 750cc, OHC liquid-cooled four-valve twins to 650cc. Pushrod OHV machines over 900cc must run under Supersport specifications See Section 10.12.1.c. d) SOUND OF THUNDER 4 (SoT4): Any single or twin cylinder four-stroke production motorcycle up to 400cc sold in the U.S. with a street-legal VIN. The Ninja 400 is limited to Supersport specifications (see 9.8.1) otherwise it must compete in SOT3. 8.5 BATTLE OF TWINS (Bill Gillis, Member #8747)

Rule Change Rationale: The speed differential between modern middleweight twins and SOS1 single cylinder machines is too great. This induces an unnecessary and avoidable safety risk. Having slower single cylinder machines in SOT2 also creates a quality of experience challenge for SOT2 riders. When SOS1 machines are gridded near the front of the SOT2 grid, it makes the most dangerous time of any race, more dangerous. The SOS1 machines are very comparable in HP and performance to the SOT3 machines. For overall and grid safety I believe this change makes responsible sense.

Committee Recommendation: Accept (Unanimouos)
Committee Rationale/Discussion: Safety issue of singles in SOT2
Board Discussion: The board discussed the phrasing of rules regarding moving Sound of Singles machines, specifically noting concerns about how the Motard class was handled and potential impacts on SOT3. 
Motion to vote GT, second TT
July Board:  no (0 yes / 8 no / 3 abstain WP, JO, JB)

Entry ID 14436 New

700 CHALLENGE: A separately scored class that grids and runs concurrently on track with Sound of Thunder 3 (SoT3).

General eligibility: four-stroke two-cylinder machines up to 799cc; four-stroke triples up to 660cc; four-stroke singles up to 700cc.

Specifically recognized machines and preparation allowances:

• Aprilia RS 660 — prepared to AHRMA Supersport specifications (see 8.1).
• Triumph Daytona 660 — prepared to AHRMA Supersport specifications (see 8.1).
• Yamaha YZF-R7 — Supersport specifications (see 8.1) with limited top-end engine modifications such as airbox and high-compression pistons.
• Suzuki SV650 — bored to a maximum displacement of 700cc, prepared to AHRMA Superbike specifications (see 9.8.2).
• Kawasaki Ninja 650 — bored to a maximum displacement of 700cc, prepared to AHRMA Superbike specifications (see 9.8.2).
• Kramer

Machines legal for Sound of Thunder 3 (see 8.4.c and 10.12.1.c) or Sound of Thunder 4 (see 8.4.d and 10.12.1.d) are also eligible to compete in 700 Challenge. (Tres Millard, #2012439)

Rule Change Rationale: 

The 700 Challenge fills a gap in AHRMA’s class structure for accessible, modern middleweight twins, small triples, and middleweight singles that do not fit cleanly into existing Sound of Thunder classes. Machines such as the Aprilia RS 660, Triumph Daytona 660, Yamaha YZF-R7, big-bore Suzuki SV650 and Kawasaki Ninja 650, and the Kramer 690 have an active grassroots racing community, are widely available, and are comparatively affordable to campaign. Today, riders bringing these bikes to AHRMA have no natural home class.

Running the class concurrently on track with SoT3 — but scoring it separately and prohibiting cross-entry — adds a new entry pathway without requiring an additional race slot in an already-full

weekend schedule. The one-way eligibility design protects competitive balance in SoT3 (which keeps its existing field rules unchanged) while giving SoT3 and SoT4 competitors the option to run up for a second result.

Anticipated benefits:

• Attracts contemporary club-racing riders to AHRMA who currently have no class fit for modern middleweight twins, small triples, or middleweight singles.
• Grows grid size at events at minimal organizational cost (shared grid with SoT3, no new race slot).
• Provides a natural development class — riders can step up from SoT4 to 700 Challenge and then on to SoT3 or above as skills and budget allow.

Preserves the integrity of the existing SoT3 class by keeping purpose-built 700 Challenge machines out of it.

Supporting Documentation 2026.05.14-AHRMA-700-Challenge-Rule-Final.pdf

Committee Recommendation: Accept (Unanimous)
Committee Rationale/Discussion: Combine w/SOT3 as one race
Board Discussion: Motion to vote WP, second TT
July Board: yes (10 yes / 0 no / 1 abstain JB)

Vintage Motocross

Entry ID 14408 Section 11

Note: A 10-year moratorium on adding new vintage motocross classes is in effect beginning in 2018 (Bob Bean, Member #10830)

Rule Change Rationale:

AHRMA needs to either remove this rule or suspend it to allow for changes in the age groups.. As members are getting older the average age of off road racers has risen. The age groups need to be changed to reflect on this aging demographics.

Also as members age, things start changing quicker than 10 year periods. There is a big difference in aging going from 40 to 5o or going from 60 to 70 or 70 to 80. In many other sports, running, bicycling etc, the age groups move in 5 year periods.

In going thru the numbers, we now know that there are enough members to justify adding a 76+ class to the age groups. (does not have to be all 3 ratings, Expert, Intermediate and Novice.. ) I seriously doubt any 76 + Novices will happen, so could be just one.

Here are the numbers for age groups of AHRMA off road members currently. Age

60-64 215 members
65 51 members
66-69 292 members
70-74 180 members
75 11 members
76-79 37 members
80+ 34 members

As we know, our new members numbers are not growing very well. How many members have we lost that aged out, feeling they are too slow for the new young 70 year olds. These are founding members who have supported AHRMA for years. We owe it to them to provide a class for them to compete in with age appropriate other members.. I will be asking the Trustees to suspend this 10 year moratorium to allow a new 76+ class for these AHRMA members… We cant afford to lose more members!

Committee Recommendation: Reject (Unanimous)
Committee Rationale/Discussion: It is the committees opinion that this rule should stay in place because we think that it will discourage most rule proposals that are not thought through. And as this proposal has shown, all one would have to do is propose the removal of this rule if one wants to propose a new class. We have yet to see a rules proposal that would warrant the removal of this rule.
Board Discussion: Motion to vote GT, second LS
July Board: no (3 yes TT, BR, JO / 8 no / 0 abstain)

Entry ID 14443 New

11.1.20 76+: Riders aged 76 and older on any size or type of eligible vintage machine. Open skill level, to be ran with novice group only due to safety concerns.(Bob Bean, Member #10830)

Rule Change Rationale: A strong suggestion per the off road director and others is to run this class with others of like speed. NEVER with 40+ , 50+ or other Expert classes.

Committee Recommendation: Reject (Unanimous)
Committee Rationale/Discussion: We feel this rule lacks safety precautions. As it is written, there would be Experts riding with Novices and bikes that could be many CC’s apart. For example; Robert Poole (an Expert) could be riding his BSA 650CC next to a Novice rider who may be riding a 100 CC machine. The horsepower and skill difference on the same track at the same time is unacceptable in my mind. Even if this rule were to be re-written to create its own gate for each skill set, we do not have enough time in the day on the West Coast to allow for more classes. This proposal can be done at any regional race as well as a national (with proper approval), there wouldn’t be any points awarded but at least the class could be run to fins out how many riders may be interested.
Board Discussion: After 14408 was rejected the board agreed no vote was needed for this proposal since it would result in a new class before the moratorium expires and discussed alternative ways to honor riders over 76 years of age without adding new classes.
July Board:

Entry ID 14459 12.1.2

12.1.2 11.1.22 Historic 125: Certain 88-125cc machines built… (through list of eligible Historic Class motorcycles). (Jim Laird, Member #19621)

Rule Change Rationale:

This rule change, which is actually more of a race day event schedule change will allow enthusiasts and members who do not race vintage classes to participate on the Vintage Classes race event day.

It will bolster attendance, participation and revenue by offering another class to fill out the lesser attended Vintage event day, while at the same time relieving the Post Vintage day/ event schedule.

Committee Recommendation: Reject (Unanimous)
Committee Rationale/Discussion: We feel that this rule is only the tip of the ice berg. If we let 125 in to the vintage days it will set a president on allowing NON VINTAGE motorcycles in which will create more classes which leads to longer days. In the rational the submitter says “It will bolster attendance, participation and revenue by offering another class to fill out the lesser attended Vintage event day, while at the same time relieving the Post Vintage day/ event schedule.” This rational does not work on the West Coast. The only day that needs bolstering is the PV day. This is similar in the middle of the country I am told by one of my committee members. He says the days are about even.
Board Discussion: Motion to vote JB, second GT
July Board: no (0 yes / 10 no / 1 abstain TT)

Post-Vintage Motocross

Entry ID 14444 New

12.4.6 76+: Riders 76 and older on any size or type eligible machine. Open skill level, to be ran with novice group only due to safety concerns. (Bob Bean, Member #10830)

Rule Change Rationale: Same rational as adding the 76+ class in my other rule change.

Committee Recommendation: Accept (3-1)
Committee Rationale/Discussion: accommodate member aging and ability level acquity changes, providing an opportunity to enjoy the sport in later life.
Board Discussion: Proponents argued it was a way to show appreciation for older riders who have been part of the program for a long time, while others questioned the logic of the 76 age cutoff and the potential for a proliferation of age-based classes.
Motion to vote WP, second GT
July Board: no (4 yes TT, BR, CR, JO / 6 no / 1 abstain JH)

Entry ID 14449 12.5 d)

12.5 d) Carburetors: Period-type carburetors are strongly encouraged. Period flat-slide carbs are allowed on historic and Gran Prix class motorcycles. Examples include Lake, Lectron, Posa and other period-type flat-slides. Active accelerator- pump-equipped carburetors are allowed only on Ultima – class motorcycles, all other; must be disconnected or removed, even if OEM-equipped. Dell”Orto accelerator pump carburetors are allowed in the Historic and Gran Prix classes only if the accelerator pump mechanism is disconnected or removed. Period Modern flat-slide Mikuni TM carburetors and all CV carburetors are allowed only on Ultima class motorcycles. Mikuni TMX and Keihin PJ and PWK flat-slide carburetors are not permitted. Modern D-shape-slide or similar equivalent aftermarket OKO are not allowed in AHRMA Post vintage off-road competition. (Bob Bean, Member #10830)

Rule Change Rationale:

This rule should be changed as Flat slide carbs came on several different models built in 82 and 83, during the Ultima model years. As carbs wear out and a lot of those old carbs are no longer available, a wider choice is needed. You can buy a modern flat slide (Chinese copy) for as low as $50 and they perform no better than the others. Changing the carbs just moves the powerband around. Careful jetting can provide better results on old carbs if not worn out.

Committee Recommendation: Reject (Unanimous)
Committee Rationale/Discussion: round slide carbs are available (Mikuni, Keihin, or Chinese copies), and the flat side carbs have a distinct advantage over round side carbs. As proposed, especially this portion he changed could be interpreted as opening the door for Modern D-shape-slide or similar equivalent aftermarket carbs in all post-vintage racing.
Board Discussion: Motion to vote WP, second GT
July Board: no (0 yes / 11 no / 0 abstain)

Observed Trials

Entry ID 14383 13.1.11

13.1.11 AIR COOLED MONO (ACM) with drum brakes only. Trials machines manufactured just after the twin shock era, but before significant performance advances were introduced to trials bike technology. Typically, mid-to-late 1980s models. (Scott Stewart, Member #3182)

Rule Change Rationale: AHRMA Road Racing and Next Gen Moto Cross have machine classes that include bikes with disc brakes.Why should Observed Trials be any different ? The 3 year moratorium for no new classes in Observed trials is over at the start of the 2027. In the past 5 years (since 2021) only Yamaha motorcycles have competed in the Air Cooled Mono Class.That’s right, just 1 steel horse/1 motorcycle brand in the class! This is probably the only place in all of AHRMA that this situation occurs. Does anyone enjoy spectating a motorcycle race where there is only 1 motorcycle manufacturer racing? AHRMA would gain new members, riders, and motorcycles if they would allow the other 90% of the the Air Cooled Mono Class to compete. It is unfortunate to think that these historical motorcycles were excluded because of their hydraulic disc brakes. It is disingenuous and petty to not right this wrong. I am not alone in this opinion, and AHRMA needs to respect all of its members, not just a select few.

Committee Recommendation: Reject (Unanimous)
Committee Rationale/Discussion: Allowing disc brakes will open AHRMA trials classes to much more modern technology.
Board Discussion: Motion to vote JB, second CR
July Board: no (0 yes / 10 no / 1 abstain TT)

Entry ID 14431 SECTION 13 OBSERVED TRIALS

NOTE: A 3-year moratorium on adding new observed trials classes is in effect, beginning in 2024 2027. (Debbie Poole, Memer #542)

Rule Change Rationale: Examining the success of AHRMA’s newest trials class, Air Cooled Mono, illustrates the validity of continuing the moratorium on new trials classes, specifically for more modern machines.

The Air Cooled Mono class (typically mind-to-late 1980’s machines) was added provisionally in 2021. For purposes of this proposal, results for 2021 and 2022 are not used, due to the negative effect COVID had on event participation.

What is discovered in the accompanying documents is that in 2023, 2024 and 2025, the Air Cooled Mono Class participation has been marginal at best. Please see documentation for more details, but in summary over these 3 years the class saw 16, 23 and 18 entries respectively, but more importantly these entries consisted of very few individual riders:

2023 7 riders
2024 10 riders
2025 11 riders

Further, if you examine the individual riders over these three years, it is shown that the participants are limited to the same 8-9 riders nationwide. The class is struggling. The class is not growing. To add another Trials class and more modern machines would likely be unsuccessful, and would further dilute entries for the existing Air Cooled Mono class.

Committee Recommendation: Accept (Unanimous)
Committee Rationale/Discussion: Committee feels the current Air Cooled Mono class is the most modern class needed at this time
Board Discussion: Motion to vote WP, second DS
July Board: yes (10 yes / 0 no / 1 abstain TT)

Entry ID 14432 13.1.10

13.1.10 VINTAGE YOUTH CLASSES: AHRMA Youth Classes are open to any rider through 14 years old. Skill levels are: Youth A riding the “2” line, Youth B riding the “3” line, and Youth C riding the “4” line. There is no minimum age requirement, just an ability to ride the loop and attempt the sections.

Eligible machines include any air-cooled, twin shock, drum brake motorcycle as manufactured of 125cc 175cc or less. Examples include 1974-1975 Yamaha TY80s, 125’s, or 175’s, some European Mini Trials bikes, and “homebuilt” specials using period correct components and techniques. (Wes Poole, Member #1012195)

Rule Change Rationale: The 125cc limit has discouraged a number of younger riders from entering the Youth class. Honda TL 125’s are about the only option, aside from TY 80’s which most kids have outgrown by the age of 9. The Honda TL 125’s are also heavy when compared to the lighter two strokes, such as the TY175. The Montesa Cota 125 and Yamaha TY 125 are good for kids, but are extremely rare and hard to find.

Committee Recommendation: Accept (Unanimous)
Committee Rationale/Discussion: Allowing 175cc machines will open riders to more machine options
Board Discussion: Motion to vote WP, second TT
July Board: yes (10 yes / 0 no / 1 abstain LS)

Entry ID 14448 13.3

Please consider updating the table to add a Masters ability level to the classic and premier classes. For the Master class riders; Classic and Premier bikes would ride the EX line, the Rigid bikes would ride the #2 line and the Girder bikes would ride the PI line at this skill/ability level. See attached marked up table. (Sean Chase, Member #2010316)

Rule Change Rationale: Several expert premier class riders in the Northwest routinely post single digit scores on the expert lines. This addition of a Master level would provide expert premier class riders an ongoing challenge and it would open up the field for upcoming expert riders.

Supporting Documentation: PXL_20260515_005316239.jpg

Committee Recommendation: Reject (2-1)
Committee Rationale/Discussion: No votes were concerned that the jump in current ability levels would be too difficult. Yes vote maintained that riders will choose to ride the more challenging Masters line – no one is forced to and all other classes are unchanged.
Board Discussion: Motion to vote WP, second JB
July Board: no (2 yes EV, JB / 6 no / 3 abstain TT, JH, CR)

Falt Track

Entry ID 14439 14.2.1

Brakeless 250 / Air Cooled rigid frame  OEM twin shock or rigid frame, the same make and model as the engine. After market rigid frames are allowed. (Stuart Wray, Member #7187)

Rule Change Rationale: 

Rigid frames were never required in the 50s and 60s. OEM frames were always allowed. Some manufactures built factory rigid racers but the vast majority of riders ran stock or modified stock frames (twin shock).The AMA didn’t even allow aftermarket frames until 1967 (Sonicweld).

Requiring rigid frames stops a lot of potential entries.

Committee Recommendation: No Recommendation
Committee Rationale/Discussion:
Board Discussion:  Motion to vote GT, second CR
July Board: yes (11 yes / 0 no / 0 abstain)

Entry ID 14440 14.2.1

Brakeless 500/750 Rigid frame or struts on OEM frame OEM or rigid frame, the same make and model as the engine. Aftermarket rigid frames are allowed. 500 OHV/750SV (Stuart Wray, Member #7187)

Rule Change Rationale: 

Rigid frames were never required in the 50s and 60s. Some manufacturers built factory race rigid frames but the vast majority of riders ran stock or modified stock (twin shock) frames. The AMA didn’t even allow aftermarket rigid frames until 1967(Sonicweld).

This rule change would allow a lot more entries.

Committee Recommendation: No Recommendation
Committee Rationale/Discussion:
Board Discussion: Motion to vote TT, second GT
July Board: yes (10 yes / 0 no / 1 abstain JB)

Cross Country

Entry ID 14416 New

15.1.1 i) 76+: Riders age 76 and older on any size or type of eligible vintage machine. Open skill level, to be ran with novice group only due to safety concerns. (Bob Bean, Member# 10830)

Rule Change Rationale: Rationale explained the same as the other proposals I made. see original..

Committee Recommendation: Accept (2-1)
Committee Rationale/Discussion: The vote was split on this, the question was asked why 76, will this change to 77 next year? Why is the wording ” to be ran with novice group only due to safety” included? MX maybe, but in CC this does not make sense, all classes are on the track at the same time. The committee would prefer one 76+ class for all riders run in the first hour, the Vintage event, as this potential rider/motorcycle combination would not upset the balance of the event.
Board Discussion: Discussion focused on whether this would create an open skill level that would unfairly disadvantage novice riders, as well as the safety implications of age-based classes in cross country versus motocross. Proponents argued it was a way to show appreciation for older riders who have been part of the program for a long time, while others questioned the logic of the 76 age cutoff and the potential for a proliferation of age-based classes.
Motion to vote WP, second CR
July Board: no (4 yes TT, BR, JO, DS / 5 no / 1 abstain JH)

Entry ID 14445 New

15.1.3 k) Riders age 70 and older on any size or type of eligible Pre-Modern, or Next Gen class machine. (Bob Bean, Member #10830)

Rule Change Rationale: To bring the age classifications in line with all the other age groups.

Committee Recommendation: Accept (Unanimous)
Committee Rationale/Discussion:
Board Discussion: Motion to vote WP, second GT
July Board: yes (10 yes / 0 no)

Entry ID 14446 New

15.1.3 l) Riders age 76 and older on any size or type of eligible Pre-Modern, or Next Gen class machine. Open skill level, to be ran with novice group only due to safety concerns. (Bob Bean, Member #10830)

Rule Change Rationale: I explained the rationale for this rule in my other proposals.. (as per Ed Roman)

Committee Recommendation: Accept (2-1)
Committee Rationale/Discussion: The vote was split on this, the question was asked why 76, will this change to 77 next year? Why is the wording ” to be ran with novice group only due to safety” included? MX maybe, but in CC this does not make sense, all classes are on the track at the same time. The committee would prefer one 76+ class for all riders run in the first hour, the Vintage event, as this potential rider/motorcycle combination would not upset the balance of the event.
Board Discussion: Despite a committee recommendation to accept, the participants maintained their previous stance regarding age-based classifications.
Motion to vote WP, second EV
July Board: no (4 yes TT, BR, JO, JB / 5 no / 1 abstain JH)

Entry ID 14447 New

15.1.2 i) 76+:Riders age 76 and older on any size or type of eligible post vintage machine. Open skill level, to be ran with novice group only due to safety concerns (Bob Bean, Member #10830)

Rule Change Rationale: Explained rationale in my other proposal. (per Ed Roman)

Committee Recommendation: Accept (2-1)
Committee Rationale/Discussion: The vote was split on this, the question was asked why 76, will this change to 77 next year? Why is the wording ” to be ran with novice group only due to safety” included? MX maybe, but in CC this does not make sense, all classes are on the track at the same time. The committee would prefer one 76+ class for all riders run in the first hour, the Vintage event, as this potential rider/motorcycle combination would not upset the balance of the event.
Board Discussion: Discussion included observations that voting patterns had shifted slightly on this specific item compared to earlier age-related proposals.
Motion to vote JO, second LS
July Board: no (3 yes TT, BR, JO / 6 no / 1 abstain JH)

Entry ID 14460 Section 15

e) ​HISTORIC 200: Historic-class machines manufactured as 88-200cc. Includes first generation twin-shock Honda XL/XR 185 and 200

…

Each of the following classes is further divided into Novice, Intermediate and Expert skill-levels.

​a)HISTORIC 200: Historic-class machines manufactured as 88-200cc. Includes first generation twin-shock Honda XL/XR 185 and 200

… (Jim Laird, Member #19621)

Rule Change Rationale: This rule change can and should include moving the Historic 200 Motocross Class to also run with the Vintage Classes, on whichever day that event is run (Saturday or Sunday). This change will bolster the Vintage Event racer entry participation and revenues for AHRMA, and also allow participants the opportunity to race their Historic Class bike on one day and also then participate in other PV Classes on the second day rather than forfeit their PV Classes in order to only being limited to running Historic Class on the PV event day.

This change will also encourage younger racers to participate by allowing them to ride a ‘slightly more modern’ and relevant motorcycle than their grandfather is racing in his 60’s. Truthfully, Historic is the pinnnacle of vintage capturing a unique era of innovation that was industry impacting, but in no way advanced or improved enough to give Historic Class bikes a significant advantage over Vintage Class machines. In some ways, the Historic Class machines are inferior because parts are extremely rare and expensive. This change allows PV racers to run the PV race, but enjoy racing their 1975-1977 ‘childhood vintage bike’. Lastly, I can convince younger people to race a Historic bike easier than trying to convince them to invest in an ‘ANTIQUE’ bike that AHRMA titles ‘Vintage’.

Committee Recommendation: Reject (Unanimous)
Committee Rationale/Discussion: The committee rejects this proposal. We have 5 riders that have ridden both Vintage and Historic classes at National events this year. The Historic classes are the “bump up” classes for a Vintage rider to enter the Post Vintage event. While ways to increase the participation in the first event at a Cross Country is an open question, the inclusion of the Historic 9 inch travel, more powerful motorcycles, into the Vintage, 4 inch travel, event would upset the balance of the event. The Historic machines come from an era after the Vintage machines and do not belong in the Vintage event. Also, moving the Historic 200 class and not the Historic Open class to the Vintage event is not correct.
Board Discussion: Motion to vote GT, second JO
July Board: no (0 yes / 8 no / 2 abstain LS, JH)

Next Gen Motocross

Entry ID 14441 New

16.9.1 e) 70+Expert and Intermediate. Any Pre-Modern or Next Gen Machine is eligible for these classes. (Bob Bean, Member #10830)

Rule Change Rationale: This rule change is to bring the NG age classes in line with all the other V and PV age classes..

Committee Recommendation: Accept (Unanimous)
Committee Rationale/Discussion: Streamline Next Gen with Vintage and Post Vintage format
Board Discussion: Motion to vote WP, second GT
July Board:  yes (10 yes / 0 no / 0 abstain)

Entry ID 14442 New

16.9.1 f 76+ Expert and Intermediate. Any Pre-Modern or Next Gen Machine is eligible for these classes. Open skill level, to be ran with novice group only due to safety concerns. (Bob Bean, Member #10830)

Rule Change Rationale: As the average age of members keeps rising, AHRMA needs to acknowledge these older riders and realize that change happens faster in the older years. Eyesight, reflexes, strength all start to go away faster each year. We cant afford to lose these founding members who have supported AHRMA for years.

Committee Recommendation: Accept (Unanimous)
Committee Rationale/Discussion: Agreed, with more members approaching 70 -75, this is a way to keep recognize and keep them participating safely.
Board Discussion: Supporters argued that this would allow older participants to continue competing safely on more manageable motorcycles.
Motion to vote GT, second TT
July Board:  no (4 yes TT, BR, JO, DS / 5 no / 1 abstain JH)

NOTE: In order for readers to readily identify the rule you are commenting about, the proposal Entry Id is required. Please also include the Section # (if any) at the beginning of your comment.  You may only comment on ONE PROPOSAL/ENTRY ID at a time.